Assets, liabilities and the difference most people never see
Not recorded yet Host Jan Sindre Heltne
The best-selling personal finance book of all time, and one of the most disputed. A walk through the ideas in Rich Dad Poor Dad – assets versus liabilities, cash flow, the rat race – and an honest look at what the criticism is about.
Rich Dad Poor Dad has sold more than 40 million copies and is probably the most widely read book on personal finance there is. It is also one of the most criticised. Both facts deserve to be taken seriously, and that is what makes it worth going through.
The book is built as a story about two father figures: the author’s own father, highly educated and securely employed, and “rich dad”, a friend’s father with little formal education and his own business. The two give contradictory advice, and the whole book is the reckoning between them.
Assets and liabilities
The core is a definition. An asset is something that puts money in your pocket. A liability is something that takes money out of it. No more complicated than that.
It sounds trivial, but the consequence is uncomfortable: much of what we call investments lands on the wrong side. A home you live in, with a mortgage, insurance, maintenance and council charges, takes money out of your pocket every month. A car does the same. By Kiyosaki’s definition they are therefore liabilities, whatever they are worth on paper.
Kiyosaki's test – which way do the money flow?
| The thing | What it does to your pocket each month | By his definition |
|---|---|---|
| A rental property with positive cash flow | Puts money in | Asset |
| The home you live in, with a mortgage | Takes money out – interest, insurance, maintenance, tax | Liability |
| The car | Takes money out, and loses value | Liability |
| Dividend-paying shares | Put money in | Asset |
Note that this is not the accounting definition. In a set of accounts the house is an asset and the mortgage is a liability, separately. Kiyosaki uses the words in his own way, and that is one of the things professionals object to. His point is practical all the same: look at the cash flow, not at the label.
The rat race
The image he uses for the trap is a wheel. You get a higher salary, and spend more. A bigger house, a more expensive car, higher fixed costs. Spending grows in step with income, and you are as exposed as before – just at a higher level.
The way out is not through earning more, but through building income that does not require you to show up at work. That is where he wants the surplus to go: into something that returns cash flow.
Working to learn
One of the better pieces of advice in the book has nothing to do with investing. Choose a job by what you learn, not only by what it pays. Sales, negotiation, accounting, communication – skills that follow you whatever you end up doing.
What the criticism is about
This has to be included, because the book is often sold without it:
- “Rich dad” is probably not a real person. Kiyosaki has never been able to document who he was, and has suggested in interviews that the figure is a construction.
- The advice is vague. The book tells you to acquire assets, but says little about how. The specifics sit in the courses and games sold alongside.
- It recommends debt and leverage without giving equal weight to what happens when the market turns. Several of the examples assume rising prices.
- The definitions collide with professional terminology, which makes the book hard to build on if you later read something more thorough.
What still holds
The distinction between something that produces money and something that costs money is a useful lens, particularly for anyone who has never thought about money that way. So is the idea that financial literacy is a skill you can train, and that a higher salary alone is not a plan.
Read it as a doorway that gets you thinking – not as a recipe to follow.
The walk-through includes the criticism the book has met.
Main topics
- Kiyosaki's distinction between assets and liabilities
- Cash flow as the measure instead of salary
- Why your home may be an expense rather than an investment
- The rat race – why a higher salary does not solve the problem
- Working to learn, not to earn
- Financial literacy as a skill you can train
- The criticism of the book, and what is actually disputed
Questions this episode answers
- What is the real difference between an asset and a liability?
- Is my home an investment or an expense?
- What does Kiyosaki mean by the rat race?
- Why does a higher salary not make you rich?
- What is passive income, and how do you build it?
- What is the criticism of Rich Dad Poor Dad?
- What is worth taking from the book, and what should you ignore?
Key points
- Kiyosaki's definition is simple: an asset gives you money, a liability costs you money.
- Cash flow says more about your finances than your salary does.
- A higher salary does not solve the problem if spending grows at the same pace.
- Financial literacy is a skill, not something you are born with.
- The book is disputed, and its advice is vaguer than it seems.
Sources and references
- Robert T. Kiyosaki – Rich Dad Poor Dad (1997)
This is an independent commentary on, and explanation of, selected ideas from Rich Dad Poor Dad. It does not replace the original work. Rights to the book belong to the respective rights holders. Editorial principles .
The content is general information and analysis, not personal investment advice.
AI is used as a tool in producing the text here, and everything is read through before it is published. Errors can still occur.
Spotted an error? Please email us at post@sporretimen.no. How we work .
Do you want to hear this one?
This episode has not been recorded yet. Say if you would like to hear it, and we will know what should come first.