Lean
Lean – value, waste and the system Toyota built
What is lean, really? A walk through the system Toyota built – value and waste, the seven wastes, the five principles, kanban and just-in-time, kaizen and PDCA – and through the criticism about redundancies, fragile supply chains and work pressure.
Back to the episode Arrow keys or swipe
What this covers
- Where lean comes from, and who coined the word
- Value defined by the customer – and everything else
- The seven wastes, on a shop floor and in an office
- The five principles from Lean Thinking
- Pulling instead of pushing – kanban and just-in-time
- Muda, mura and muri – the two Ms that get forgotten
- The toolbox, and what the Japanese words actually mean
What this covers (cont.)
- Kaizen and PDCA – improvement as a habit rather than a project
- The criticism – redundancies, fragility and work pressure
- What holds up once the decoration is stripped away
Where it comes from
Lean is a Western umbrella term for the Toyota Production System, developed at Toyota in Japan in the decades after the Second World War. Taiichi Ohno is regarded as its principal architect, with Shigeo Shingo as a central contributor.
Value, and everything else
The whole system rests on one distinction, and it is worth taking seriously before moving on to the tools.
Value is what the customer is actually willing to pay for. Everything else is waste.
The test: would the customer pay more for this step if they saw it? Welding the frame – yes. The part sitting in a warehouse for three weeks first, being carted back and forth between two buildings, someone filling in a form nobody reads – no. That does not make those steps unnecessary today, but it does make them candidates for removal.
The seven wastes
Ohno set out seven kinds of waste. They were conceived for a factory, but they translate to office work surprisingly directly.
The seven wastes
| Waste | On a shop floor | In an office |
|---|---|---|
| Overproduction | Making more than the next step needs now | Reports nobody reads, meetings nobody needed |
| Waiting | A machine idle, an operator waiting for parts | Waiting for an approval, a reply, an access right |
| Transport | Parts moved between buildings and halls | A case passed between four departments |
| Overprocessing | Tighter tolerances than the customer needs | Fifteen fields where five would do |
| Inventory | Halls of half-finished goods | Queues of unfinished cases and unanswered enquiries |
| Motion | The operator reaching for a tool | Searching four systems to find one number |
| Defects | Scrapped parts, rework | Bad data that has to be corrected further down the chain |
The five principles
In Lean Thinking (1996) Womack and Jones set out five principles describing the order the work should be done in. They have become the most common way into lean outside the car industry.
The order, as Womack and Jones set it out
- 1. Specify valueSeen from the customer, not from your own department. This step is the one most often skipped.
- 2. Map the value streamEvery step from order to delivered. Including the ones nobody has drawn before.
- 3. Create flowGet the work moving without stalling in queues between the steps.
- 4. Let the customer pullNothing is made until the next step actually asks for it.
- 5. Pursue perfectionNot an end point, but never declaring it finished.
Pulling instead of pushing
This is the biggest practical break from conventional planning, and it is easy to recognise for anyone who has worked with production planning.
Two ways to govern work
Push
The plan decides
- Produced against a forecast and a plan
- Finished goods are pushed on to the next step
- When the forecast is wrong, inventory builds
- Classic MRP and ERP logic
Pull
Demand decides
- Produced when the next step asks for it
- A signal triggers replenishment – that is what kanban is
- Inventory stays low because it is not refilled unprompted
- Requires short changeover times to be possible at all
Muda, mura and muri
This is where Western lean parts company with Toyota, and it may be the most useful part of the whole episode.
The three Ms
| The word | What it means | What it looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Muda | Waste | The seven above. The only one most people look for. |
| Mura | Unevenness | A quiet Monday, chaos on Friday. Swings in load and staffing. |
| Muri | Overburden | People and machines run beyond capacity, over time. |
The toolbox
The Japanese words are one reason lean seems more mysterious than it is. Most of them mean something fairly everyday.
The words you will meet
| Word | Means | Used for |
|---|---|---|
| Kaizen | Improvement | Many small improvements in daily work, made by the people doing it |
| Kanban | Sign, signal | A card or an empty bin that says “refill” – the engine of pull |
| Jidoka | Automation with a human touch | Equipment that stops itself on a fault, and the right to stop the line |
| Poka-yoke | Guarding against slips | Design that makes fitting a part the wrong way physically impossible |
| Heijunka | Levelling | Evening out volume and product mix, so the peaks disappear |
| Gemba | The actual place | Going where the work happens and seeing for yourself, rather than reading a report |
| 5S | Five words that all begin with s | Sort, set in order, shine, standardise and sustain |
Improvement as a habit
Kaizen is the part that separates lean from a project. The idea is not one big push once a year, but small changes all the time, proposed and carried out by the people doing the work.
PDCA – and then again
- 1PlanDescribe the problem and what you think the cause is. State a measure that could turn out to be wrong.
- 2DoTry it at small scale. Do not roll anything out across the organisation yet.
- 3CheckMeasure it against something. Did it actually get better, or just different?
- 4ActIf it worked, it becomes the new standard. If it did not, you start again with what you learned.
↻ And then it starts over on the next problem
The criticism
This is a walk through what lean is, and the objections belong in that. Several of them are well founded.
Just-in-time is efficient and fragile for precisely the same reason: there is no inventory to fall back on.
That is not a flaw in the method, but a cost of it. Low inventories free up capital and expose problems quickly. Those same low inventories mean one stoppage anywhere propagates through the whole chain. The disruptions to world trade in recent years made that trade-off visible to everyone, and many organisations have since built buffers back in deliberately.
What holds up
Once the decoration is stripped away, a few ideas are left that hold outside a car factory too.
Key points
- Lean is about flow, not about saving. Cost reduction is a side effect, not the aim.
- Value is what the customer will actually pay for. Everything else is a candidate for removal.
- Ohno rated overproduction the worst waste: it hides all the others.
- Pulling rather than pushing is the biggest practical break from conventional planning.
Key points (cont.)
- Western lean tends to hunt only for waste, and misses unevenness and overburden.
- Kaizen is many small improvements in daily work, not one large project.
- Lean installed as tools without the culture behind it tends to stall within a year.
- Just-in-time is efficient and fragile for precisely the same reason.
Questions this answers
- What is lean, really?
- Where does lean come from, and who coined the word?
- What do value and waste mean in lean?
- What are the seven wastes?
- What is the difference between pushing and pulling work?
- What are kanban, kaizen, jidoka and poka-yoke?
Questions this answers (cont.)
- What do muda, mura and muri mean?
- Why do so many lean rollouts fail?
- Is lean just a nicer word for cutting staff?
- Does just-in-time make the supply chain fragile?
Sources
- Taiichi Ohno – Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production (Japanese 1978, English 1988)
- John Krafcik – Triumph of the Lean Production System, Sloan Management Review (1988)
- James P. Womack, Daniel T. Jones and Daniel Roos – The Machine That Changed the World (1990)
- James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones – Lean Thinking (1996)
- Jeffrey K. Liker – The Toyota Way (2004)
Spørretimen
Read the whole thing at
www.sporretimen.no/en/episodes/lean-forklart/